🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.